Comparing Millers Enemy of the People, Becketts Waiting for Godot and Vonneguts Slaughterhouse-F :: comparison compare contrast essays

Human Values and Technology in Miller's Enemy of the People, Beckett's Waiting for Godot and Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse-Five Human qualities can't be supplanted by innovation. Human qualities can simply would like to advance as fast as innovation is extending. On the off chance that one lingers behind the other, it's human qualities. Innovation can exist and capacity without human qualities. There is a scramble for Isaac Newton however that doesn't invalidate the requirement for a decent logician. In spite of the fact that both innovation and human qualities can be utilized connected at the hip and that is the perfect circumstance. A lot of anything is an awful thing. It's everything about finding a parity. Adversary of the People is the ideal case of how human qualities now and then don't develop as fast as innovation. The town had the innovation accessible to ensure the underground aquifers were satisfactory yet not exclusively did they not put that innovation to utilize yet they tested the discoveries with no verification of their own. The town all in all had no involvement in this sort of science previously. In this way, they were in a flash wary (they likewise profited monetarily by not trusting it). In any case, what the town ought to have done was step back and take a gander at all the realities (wiped out guests (Miller 35) and the low admission (Miller 36)) and settled on an educated choice rather than simply running from the obscure. They happen to have capacity and information, (Miller 45) is what Dr. Stockman told Hovstad. He expected that these individuals had a similar trust and information in innovation that he had however he wasn't right. Individuals need an approach to manage the ever-developing new innovation. It was alarming for the town to accept that there were things occurring on the bacterial level (one that they couldn't see). Did the town decide not to accept the explicit truth since it would hurt them, the slanted realities or out of dread of the obscure and the results. Numbness is ecstasy, yet human advancement should be educated regarding what's happening and how it influences their lives. An individual can't simply take things on trust when managing science, they need confirmation and a clarification. It's anything but difficult to follow the mass in anything (particularly popular sentiment) yet one needs to ask themselves how educated is the overall population?